391
by Mr Ball, Judge of the Summary Jurisdiction Court), I considered it right for the information of the public
to re
reply
to Mr Whittall's several points
in detail; and I did so
had previously
Protest was
of
louneil
and thats
if
because I
1
contended that the
an eN
asion
of
the Rule 9
against writter Speeches, i
entered on the minutes
it would either appear uncontradicted), er would invite a number of replies,
which must also appear on the minutes,
in violation
of
all our Council practice.
On my suggestion therefore
Walls Whittall that his purpose
with the Ordinance itself, that ~
gentleman declared himself
and the difficulty,
Satisfied, entering
on
, as to
the minutes the document
and the consequent replies to it, -
disappeared.
The objections, which In
entertained and
entert
expressed
to the
Council, to the several points advanced.
by allz Whittall,
wvere
briefly as follows:
7. His first point was singularly
inapplicable,
a
reference
to the 24
bouneil rule will shew; for the-
th
re-introduction of this measure was
"{
not
during
would be answered.
by my sending
his Protest home to be considered
discussion", and "Thoreover
puitting this aside, it was re-introduced
"to correct an error, and with the
EX
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.